| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This is common with BGP (RFC 8950), but the underlying
principle is will soon have it's own RFC.
Example: (guest VM)
ip addr add 192.0.2.42/32 dev lo
ip route add proto static 0.0.0.0/0 via inet6 2001:db8:1337::1
RFC 8950: Advertising IPv4 NLRI with an IPv6 Next Hop
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8950
draft-ietf-intarea-v4-via-v6: IPv4 routes with an IPv6 next hop
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-intarea-v4-via-v6/
Signed-off-by: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@2e8.dk>
|
|
Fix issues reported by shellcheck v0.11.0
Signed-off-by: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@2e8.dk>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@2e8.dk>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@2e8.dk>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@2e8.dk>
|
|
If there is no '<routed-subnet xmlns="...">' tag, then the xmllint
call will fail, and since we are running with `set -e`, then it will
terminate the script.
Before a VM not using routed-subnet would cause the following error:
error: Hook script execution failed: internal error: \
Child process (LC_ALL=C PATH=<...> /etc/libvirt/hooks/qemu <vm> \
prepare begin -) unexpected exit status 10
Signed-off-by: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@2e8.dk>
|
|
No functional change intended.
|
|
Signed-off-by: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@2e8.dk>
|
|
|
